Hinkley Point C is £1.5bn over budget and a year behind schedule

Hinkley Point C is £1.5bn over budget and a year behind schedule

The UK’s first nuclear power station for more than two decades is at least £1.5bn over budget and could be completed 15 months behind schedule, its developer has admitted.

French state-owned EDF said the cost overrun for two new reactors at Hinkley in Somerset could hit £2.2bn, taking the total spend to £20.3bn, up from £18bn previously.

EDF confirmed the first reactor – originally due to become operational by the end of 2025 – risked being 15 months late and might not start generating electricity until 2027. The second unit is estimated to face a nine-month delay.

Experts said the UK faced significant challenges to electricity supply and the prospect of further delay at Hinkley meant ageing power stations may need to be kept open longer.

In a review of costs for Hinkley, EDF said £1.5bn of the increase was due to a “better understanding” of the construction work needed and UK regulatory requirements. The estimated delay on completing the reactors – which are meant to set a new standard for nuclear safety – would add a further £0.7bn in cost.

But the company insisted it was still aiming for a delivery date of the end of 2025, and said it was on track to pour the concrete for the first reactor in 2019.

“We are very clear that the team must remain mobilised on the initial objective of 2025,” said Vincent de Rivaz, chief executive of EDF Energy. “We have in our hands what we need to deliver [the project on time].”

The two other major nuclear power stations using the same design, in France and Finland, are years behind schedule and significantly over budget.

De Rivaz told the House of Lords last year that the company had “dramatically” changed its approach for Hinkley, compared with Flamanville 3 in north-west France, which was originally due to be finished in 2012 but was not expected to be complete until late 2018.

The chief executive, who is stepping down in October, told the Guardian the very existence of this review was an example that lessons had been learned. Asked if he could guarantee that the UK taxpayer would not be on the hook if costs continued to escalate in the future, he said: “Absolutely. Definitely. Totally.”

In 2007, De Rivaz predicted that by Christmas in 2017, turkeys would be cooked using atomic power from new reactors at Hinkley.

The latest bad news about the plant came just over a week after the public spending watchdog condemned the government for locking consumers into an “expensive and risky” project by signing a subsidy deal guaranteeing a set price for power from the reactors.

The Green party said EDF’s review of costs should be the “final nail in the coffin” for Hinkley, a third of which is financed by the Chinese General Nuclear Power Group.

“Hardly a week passes at the moment without new evidence that Hinkley is a terrible deal,” said the party’s co-leader, Jonathan Bartley.

John Sauven, executive director at Greenpeace UK, said: “Hinkley is already over time and over budget after just a few months of building work. Today’s news is yet another damning indictment of the government’s agreement to go ahead with this project.”

Source: The Guardian

Date: July 2017

Read the article


Tags assigned to this article:
costsnuclear

Related Articles

Rich countries sweep billions in public finance for coal under the rug as climate deadlines loom

Over the last eight years, while climate impacts accelerate, country governments have channelled more than US$ 73 billion of public

Big Australian banks invest $7bn more in fossil fuels than renewables

Australia’s big four banks invested three times as much in global fossil fuels as they did in clean energy in

Trump’s DOE invests $62 million in concentrated solar power

The DOE recently issued a press release stating they’ll invest up to $82 million in research: $62 million for CSP