Greenpeace ‘sting’ reveals U.S. university researchers willing to flatter coal and oil companies for a big fee

Greenpeace ‘sting’ reveals U.S. university researchers willing to flatter coal and oil companies for a big fee

By our special correspondent Eric J. Lyman (@EricJLyman)

PARIS – An investigation by a leading environmental group has exposed what it says is proof that research organizations at U.S. universities were willing to write and publish research papers inaccurately expounding on the virtues of coal and oil.

The research paper from Greenpeace used climate campaigners who posed as representatives of fossil fuel companies and approached professors from Penn State and Princeton Universities to ask them to write research papers indicating those fuel sources were not harmful to the environment.

“The professors agreed to write the reports and said they did not need to disclose the source of the funding,” Greenpeace said in a release, which was distributed on the sidelines of the Paris climate summit.

According to copies of the e-mails provided by Greenpeace, one professor, Penn State sociologist Frank Clemente said he could produce an eight- to ten-page report “to counter damaging research linking coal to premature deaths” for $15,000.

A Princeton professor emeritus, William Happer, said he would charge $250 per hour, or an estimated $8,000 for a full paper. “I don’t think there would be any problem stating that ‘The author received no financial compensation for this essay,’” Happer wrote, according to the e-mails.

Behind Energy contacted the communications officers for both universities seeking comment. Penn State did not reply, and a Princeton spokesman e-mailed to say the university would not comment.

Environmental groups said they were not surprised by Greenpeace’s findings.

“This report is consistent with the kind of conduct we’ve seen from the efforts of fossil fuel companies to cloud the integrity of the climate change debate,” said Ken Kimmell, president of the U.S.-based Union of Concerned Scientists.

Tags assigned to this article:
COP21 @enfossil fuelsresearchUnited States

Related Articles

Scotland’s record-breaking wind output enough to power 5 million homes

Scotland, which is fast on track to get 100 percent of its electricity via renewable energy by 2020, has broken

USA Election 2016 | How the next President could expand Obama’s climate policies or dismantle them

This month, President Obama basically ensured that climate change will be one of the major issues at stake in the

Don’t look now, but oil prices are rising

Crude oil prices, which have rattled petrostates by plunging 60 percent from their summer 2014 highs, are suddenly leaping back