Rockefeller Fund: ‘The oil age is coming to an end’

Rockefeller Fund: ‘The oil age is coming to an end’

Stephen Heintz, president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, explains to DW how it makes perfect sense that a fund which got rich on oil is now divesting from fossil fuels. With its announcement to pull out of oil and coal, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund became a figurehead of the divestment movement.

DW talked to the fund’s president about what was behind the move.


DW: John D. Rockefeller heralded a new era in history with Standard Oil. Are the Rockefellers now ending the oil age?

Stephen Heintz: We are hoping to help to finish the oil age. It is time to move away from fossil fuels, and to move as quickly as possible to clean, renewable energy in order to save the planet. The oil age is now coming to its own end.


Why was your announcement that the Rockefeller Brothers Fund is pulling out of oil and coal such a big surprise?

It is ironic that the family whose wealth was created in the oil industry is now a leading force in the effort to abandon fossil fuels.


The Rockefellers are one of the wealthiest and most influential dynasties in America. Which impact did your announcement have?

I think it has helped to draw more attention to the risks of climate change, and significantly contributed to building momentum in the divestment movement. We hope that it will help trigger historic change.


Are there any figures?

By the time the world’s leaders gather in Paris in December for the climate negotiations, we expect that the total volume value of divested assets held by investors who have committed to divest from fossil fuels will be more than 2.5 trillion dollars. Maybe more.

A lot of institutions are pulling out of coal oil and gas. To ban coal is an important first step. During the Climate Conference in Paris we expect to announce more than 200 divesting institutions – some are very high-profile.


What is the reason for this gigantic shift of assets?

The moral urgency as well as the economic impact of the global carbon budget. One of our grantees is Carbon Tracker, a sophisticated, London-based research organization. Their analyses indicate that 60 to 80 percent of known fossil fuel reserves need to stay unburned in the ground.

This is the only chance to remain below the significant 2-degree [Celsius] global warming barrier, and to avoid the worst climate catastrophes.


Last year UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and more than 400,000 demonstrators marched the streets of New York in order to mobilize climate action. Do stakeholders worry that oil, coal and gas will soon be slow sellers?

Yes. Indispensable new climate laws and Co2 taxes will significantly devaluate those assets.


What did you tell the Rockefeller family members?

We said that as a grant-maker devoting more than 40 percent of our grant dollars to efforts to fight climate change, it is morally inconsistent to stay invested in the fossil fuel industry. Also, economically there is a very strong case for pulling out of oil, coal and tar sands oil, and for shifting these assets into clean energy and new technology.


In 1870, John D. Rockefeller founded Standard Oil, which made him the richest man of his time. Would he turn over in his grave if he heard the news?

John D. Rockefeller was a brilliant entrepreneur and innovator. He took advantage of what he saw in the future. He realized that oil, the new substance that had just been discovered, had the potential to transform the world – and make a lot of money. And he did both.


What would John D. Rockefeller do today?

Standard Oil was the world’s first truly global company. Rockefeller was a global thinker and a global actor. Today he would be looking at the globe and seeing enormous risks from climate change, with devastating economic consequences and enormous opportunities in the green sector. He would be looking at clean energy economy and saying: That is where the world is going. That is where the world needs to go. I want to get there first, to get significant returns.


Source: Deutsche Welle

Date: November 2015

Read the article

Tags assigned to this article:
fossil fuelsinvestmentsoilrenewables

Related Articles

UK nuclear ambitions dealt fatal blow by Austrian legal challenge, say Greens

Plans for a new generation of nuclear reactors in the UK have been dealt a fatal blow by Austria’s decision

Seize the day

Most of the time, economic policymaking is about tinkering at the edges. Politicians argue furiously about modest changes to taxes

UNEP’s 9th annual ‘Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2015’ report released

Global investments in renewable energy rebounded strongly last year, registering a solid 17% increase to $270 Billion in 2014 after